1.a) People are making arguments like
That the show is soft core porn and that it should not be broadcasted of chanel 10.
b) 1.yes, to me the show was like soft core porn
2. I walked in to see the most blatant nudity - no attempts at even low level discretion which you find in most shows on free-to-air.
3. This crap should be on pay tv. If you want that kind of “freedom”, pay for it!!!
c) Shock tactics, Emotive language & statistics
d) They are effective because they are being emotive and helping people see where they’re coming from.
2.a) People are making arguments like
They’re children may chanel surf and come across the show, and its not appropriate for children of that young age.
b) 1.Mine was channel surfing and stumbled across it at the same time. Wont ever be able to watch “The Nanny” the same way again
2. Seriously if you think this is pornography then you are an A grade wuss
3. If you don’t like it then switch it off. For the record, I watched it and found it quite ordinary
c) Rhetorical Questions, Sarcasm, Statistics
d) These Arguments are effective because they are going against what Mr Bolt is saying in a sarcastic way making him not be able to reply to them.
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor,
I am Kathleen Politis and I am writing in because I find that the article written you Mr. Bolt in the Herald Sun concerning the so called ‘controversial’ show ‘Californication’ on Channel 10 is absolute rubbish and is a very one sided article. I am quite disgusted at the statements made by Mr Bolt, he constantly refers to the show as having no storyline but instead just soft core porn. Seriously Mr Bolt shouldn’t you be making that assumption after watching more than one show. You also state that the show destroys all moral values, honeslty do you know the meaning of moral values? You change your argument throughout your article from complaining that the show is basicly soft core porn to talking nonsense about moral values. I honestly think you should re think what you are going to write and check if it has anything to do with your contention. Out of a small survey I have conducted throughout my school, 92% of people disagree with your article.
I think you have shocked many people with your article, because I personally do not appreciate your outlook on ‘Californication’.
From Kathleen Politis 10E
I am Kathleen Politis and I am writing in because I find that the article written you Mr. Bolt in the Herald Sun concerning the so called ‘controversial’ show ‘Californication’ on Channel 10 is absolute rubbish and is a very one sided article. I am quite disgusted at the statements made by Mr Bolt, he constantly refers to the show as having no storyline but instead just soft core porn. Seriously Mr Bolt shouldn’t you be making that assumption after watching more than one show. You also state that the show destroys all moral values, honeslty do you know the meaning of moral values? You change your argument throughout your article from complaining that the show is basicly soft core porn to talking nonsense about moral values. I honestly think you should re think what you are going to write and check if it has anything to do with your contention. Out of a small survey I have conducted throughout my school, 92% of people disagree with your article.
I think you have shocked many people with your article, because I personally do not appreciate your outlook on ‘Californication’.
From Kathleen Politis 10E
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
